[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Accept-encoding: gzip
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Accept-encoding: gzip
- From: light zoo <lightzook@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:40:19 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=cpjn4VCt84py6qng1pmeP9veOZ96IszW37DkT6CHcvv0KsCix8pWeMEPh5P/OCAwHJgK/dwEKF270i9UIGshLKwqzelZZIfjRfz85x3Yh7c7l1Yc4llhuTYE1AROkLT1ttqgNBSRMRp0/+79pD3jfPWPCdBkx+FIT+YG81pwyV0=;
- In-reply-to: <232307.66738.qm@web63010.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--- light zoo <lightzook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> --- Mike Cardwell <tor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >> Or am I missing something?
> >>
> >> Mike
>
> Yes, you are missing something...and that is header
> munging. If you use compression then the headers
> can/may not be munged (spoofed and modified) as far
> as I understand.
err...my bad. I just re-read your original email and
realized your not referring to browser accept
encoding.
Regards,
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com