[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: DETACHED streams



Yes, Im attaching streams by myself. Should it be a reason for problems?

Marek


2009/4/8 Василий Озеров <fr33m2n@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Have you specified option in torrc:
>
> __LeaveStreamsUnattached=1
>
> ?
>
> 2009/4/8 slush <slush@xxxxxxxx>:
>> Thanks to reply. For now, I found one exit, which do it permanently -
>> Fireduck. From router description you can see below, that Fireduck is
>> exit router and has 80 port open. But Im not succesfull to create
>> circuit to Fireduck (doesnt matter, which relays I choose).
>>
>> From log of my app you see, that I create circuit by standard way, but
>> for some exits (example - Fireduck), after attaching stream to
>> circuit, circuit fails. Have to notice, that my code works for tons of
>> exits without this problem.
>>
>> Anybody have tips, what mean "DETACHED" in this case? Is Fireduck "bad exit"?
>>
>> Marek
>>
>> -------------------------------------------
>> Waiting to circuit: 63, timeout 14, vallenator
>> (7FB47171747D21E9827C2283C59EC1690B058BC6), Fireduck
>> (068C00C57DC0AA342EE7E387686639475822A793))
>> 63 EXTENDED ['vallenator', 'Fireduck']
>> 63 BUILT ['vallenator', 'Fireduck']
>> Status: BUILT
>>>>> thread #000, timestamp 1239156444.522074, Circuit 63 is ready (exit 068C00C57DC0AA342EE7E387686639475822A793)
>>>>> thread #000, timestamp 1239156444.522186, IP for www.seznam.cz is: 77.75.76.3
>>>>> thread #000, timestamp 1239156444.522325, Connecting to proxy
>>>>> thread #000, timestamp 1239156444.522418, Connecting to final destination
>> Attach stream 218  to circuit 63
>> STREAM 218 NEW 0 77.75.76.3
>> STREAM 218 SENTCONNECT 63 77.75.76.3
>> STREAM 218 DETACHED 63 77.75.76.3
>> 63 CLOSED ['vallenator', 'Fireduck']
>>>>> thread #000, timestamp 1239156474.525524, Failed to connect destination, timed out
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> AUTHENTICATE
>> 250 OK
>> getinfo desc/name/Fireduck
>> 250+desc/name/Fireduck=
>> router Fireduck 69.31.13.209 1443 0 9030
>> platform Tor 0.2.0.34 (r18423) on Windows XP Service Pack 3
>> [workstation] {terminal services, single user}
>> opt protocols Link 1 2 Circuit 1
>> published 2009-04-07 23:41:45
>> opt fingerprint 068C 00C5 7DC0 AA34 2EE7 E387 6866 3947 5822 A793
>> uptime 85449
>> bandwidth 307200 1024000 95793
>> opt extra-info-digest F8A279CA6558420C3BB1859954F124912750BAA5
>> onion-key
>> reject 0.0.0.0/8:*
>> reject 169.254.0.0/16:*
>> reject 127.0.0.0/8:*
>> reject 192.168.0.0/16:*
>> reject 10.0.0.0/8:*
>> reject 172.16.0.0/12:*
>> reject 69.31.13.209:*
>> reject *:25
>> reject *:119
>> reject *:135-139
>> reject *:445
>> reject *:465
>> reject *:563
>> reject *:587
>> reject *:1214
>> reject *:4661-4666
>> reject *:6346-6429
>> reject *:6699
>> reject *:6881-6999
>> accept *:*
>> router-signature
>> ----------------------------
>>
>> 2009/4/7 Василий Озеров <fr33m2n@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>> I think, that the exit node of your circuit can't be exit node.
>>> Can you post servers descriptors wich are in the circuit?
>>>
>>> something like this: "getinfo desc/name/youservername".
>>>
>>> 2009/4/7 slush <slush@xxxxxxxx>:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Im playing around Tor control port, own streams and own circuits. Im
>>>> surprised, that Tor sometimes say me "STREAM xxx is DETACHED from
>>>> circuit xxx" just few seconds after I obtain "SENTCONNECT" message. Do
>>>> anybody know why?
>>>>
>>>> Im trying to build own circuit, but when Tor detach my stream in some
>>>> cases, my connection is broken...
>>>>
>>>> Thanx,
>>>> Marek
>>>>
>>>> P.S. Sorry for english, 3am here...
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR, Ozerov Vasiliy aka fr33man.
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR, Ozerov Vasiliy aka fr33man.
>