Re: enabling bridges on NATed clients

[Andrea Trentini <andrea.trentini@xxxxxxxx>]

Marco Bonetti wrote:
> sird@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> What do you guys think about using http://samy.pl/pwnat/ idea to allow
>> people that want to run a bridge behind a NAT? Maybe enhance the
>> discovery protocol to this kind of stuff.
> It's cool to personally implement it if you want to made a NAT-ted node
> visible: run pwnat on both servers and fire up tor on the internal one.
> Here in Italy we've a big provider which heavily use NAT (Fastweb) if
> you dig up the mailing list archive you can find a guy (Ian, maybe?
> can't recall right now) who was able to publish a NAT-ted node using
> iptables and an external host.

if you're referring to this:
http://atrent.it/atrentwiki/doku.php?id=tunneled
it's done with ssh tunnels

-- 
I'm going to give my psychoanalyst one more year, then I'm going to
Lourdes.
		-- Woody Allen
------------------------------------------------

    /\_______________
   /--\ndrea |rentini

 http://atrent.it
  Laboratorio Software Libero @
   Dipartimento di Informatica e Comunicazione @
    Universita' degli Studi di Milano

         http://netlamps.org
        http://motocivismo.it   [Freedom]
            /        :        \   |   |
           /         :  v_@_   \  |   |
          /          :   _H_\   \
         /           :  [-#-]    \
        /            :   °U       \

Aria Milano: http://motocivismo.it/wiki/doku.php?id=storicoaria

***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/