Marco Bonetti wrote:
sird@xxxxxxx wrote:
What do you guys think about using http://samy.pl/pwnat/ idea to
allow
people that want to run a bridge behind a NAT? Maybe enhance the
discovery protocol to this kind of stuff.
It's cool to personally implement it if you want to made a NAT-ted
node
visible: run pwnat on both servers and fire up tor on the internal
one.
Here in Italy we've a big provider which heavily use NAT (Fastweb) if
you dig up the mailing list archive you can find a guy (Ian, maybe?
can't recall right now) who was able to publish a NAT-ted node using
iptables and an external host.
if you're referring to this:
http://atrent.it/atrentwiki/doku.php?id=tunneled
it's done with ssh tunnels
--
I'm going to give my psychoanalyst one more year, then I'm going to
Lourdes.
-- Woody Allen
------------------------------------------------
/\_______________
/--\ndrea |rentini
http://atrent.it
Laboratorio Software Libero @
Dipartimento di Informatica e Comunicazione @
Universita' degli Studi di Milano
http://netlamps.org
http://motocivismo.it [Freedom]
/ : \ | |
/ : v_@_ \ | |
/ : _H_\ \
/ : [-#-] \
/ : ÂU \
Aria Milano: http://motocivismo.it/wiki/doku.php?id=storicoaria
***
********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/