[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Google talk and other VoIP's

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Google talk and other VoIP's
From: phobos@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:50:01 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:51:17 -0400
In-reply-to: <5c4c375e05082508406c861495@mail.gmail.com>
Mail-followup-to: phobos@xxxxxxxxxx, or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <5c4c375e05082508406c861495@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Most likely not, however much like any other IM/VOIP product going over
tor, latency may make the VOIP conversation unbearable.

On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 12:40:22PM -0300, mlthorne@xxxxxxxxx wrote 0.2K bytes in 7 lines about:
: I know that Tor has asked for no filesharing, for bandwidth and server
: reasons. Would google talk (and other Voip's) cause the same kinds of
: bandwidth problems?
: 
: Though I would ask b4 I caused a problem.
: 
: -=Matt=-

-- 
Andrew

References:
- Google talk and other VoIP's
  - From: Matt Thorne

Prev by Author: Re: servers using netbios??
Next by Author: Re: PIDFile not written/missing in tor-0.1.1.5-alpha-cvs
Previous by thread: Google talk and other VoIP's
Next by thread: Re: Google talk and other VoIP's
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread