[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: dns-proxy-tor / freecap
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: dns-proxy-tor / freecap
- From: Anothony Georgeo <anogeorgeo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 12:25:55 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=bCpaXbByIb4CeLp1ikkoUYQKWs3d/iJsGQNmbxgJNjsgy3l1ohsR7HsQxs9CCXIZYzZqOlg6P+X2pbziNNiZAMzEhWP4EFWX/X4ui6VrZ9eaa6X5HKcPG/dDgEypxoi0VbSjYckILO0tDVi7u6pyBa8AJML1gXSYrncEJL0CSO8= ;
- In-reply-to: <20060804161706.65f71a5a@localhost>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Fabian,
Fabian Keil <freebsd-listen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If you use it together with a decent packet filter,
you can make sure that there is no unencrypted
DNS traffic and connections from broken applications are
redirected into dns-proxy-tor or just fail.
If the Windows DNS server is configure to route into 127.0.0.1 (tor-dns-proxy) or 127.1.2.2 (TorDNS-Localhost) then a packet filter should not be required correct?
Even if a broken app used it's default, wouldn't the Windows DNS server _force_ the app to use the configured Windows DNS server address?
Setting the "Preferred DNS Server" in Network Connetions should force all DNS quaries into the specified address, correct?
Thank you, Anogeorgeo
Do you Yahoo!?
Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.