[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tor bug?: AllowInvalidNodes

On Wednesday 16 August 2006 06:03, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:49:07PM -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> > True. I've been eyeing those servers for a while now. I believe the
> > correct fix (rather than trying to hunt down the operator(s)) is to
> > put in the patch that's been on the TODO for a while, to treat
> > nodes in the same /16 as in the same family, even if they don't
> > explicitly volunteer that information.
> >
> > Hopefully that will be in rsn, depending on when we get time to
> > actually do dev work. :}
> Ok, I bit the bullet and just added that patch to the current svn
> trunk. Feel free to upgrade if you want what might be more security
> for this case. :)
> --Roger


Sorry, but I think that patch is not the correct way to go. With 
"AllowInvalidNodes middle,rendezvous" (Tor v. in my 
torrc-file, I expect my Tor client not to build a circuit that uses an 
invalid exit node. So apparently, something concerning this option is 
broken and this should be fixed.


Gompie <gompie.tor@xxxxxxx>