[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: How interesting

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: How interesting
From: Dave Page <grimoire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:41:11 +0000
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:35:59 -0400
In-reply-to: <BAY13-F1749DF70DBEE5245274971F8450@phx.gbl>
References: <BAY13-F1749DF70DBEE5245274971F8450@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 01:32:26PM +0000, diddler4u@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> A search in Google for TOR shows that Tor is a registered trademark. Does 
> that mean the use of Tor can be forced to change to something else? Which 
> came first, the Tor project, or the registered trademark?

Trademarks are only valid within a particular field of endeavour. Since
tor.com is a book publisher, not a provider of anonymity software, there
should be no problem.

This is why Apple Record and Apple Computers both traded happily until
Apple Computers started providing music...

Dave
-- 
Dave Page <grimoire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Jabber: grimoire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: How interesting
  - From: Marco A. Calamari

References:
- How interesting
  - From: diddler4u

Prev by Author: Re: tor trying to pop mail from random IPs on win32
Next by Author: Re: Re[2]: Can governments block tor?
Previous by thread: How interesting
Next by thread: Re: How interesting
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread