[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: How interesting

On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 13:41 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 01:32:26PM +0000, diddler4u@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > A search in Google for TOR shows that Tor is a registered trademark. Does 
> > that mean the use of Tor can be forced to change to something else? Which 
> > came first, the Tor project, or the registered trademark?
> Trademarks are only valid within a particular field of endeavour. Since
> tor.com is a book publisher, not a provider of anonymity software, there
> should be no problem.
> This is why Apple Record and Apple Computers both traded happily until
> Apple Computers started providing music...

I don't think happily...

They were in legal fight for decades ....
 ... it is famous legal match.

"Prior art" or "different domain" are thing
 that must be demonstrated by the defender
 during a legal fight, and sentenced by a judge.

JM2C      Marco

> Dave

+--------------- http://www.winstonsmith.info ---------------+
| il Progetto Winston Smith: scolleghiamo il Grande Fratello |
| the Winston Smith Project: unplug the Big Brother          |
| Marco A. Calamari marcoc@xxxxxxxxx  http://www.marcoc.it   |
| DSS/DH:  8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B |
+ PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 ----------+

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part