[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Privoxy usage?

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Privoxy usage?
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <Juliusz.Chroboczek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 14:14:36 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 08:14:49 -0400
In-reply-to: <4ef5fec60708160634w5a7731f6i83c85930e20bd891@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (coderman@xxxxxxxxx's message of "Thu\, 16 Aug 2007 06\:34\:08 -0700")
References: <20070816131942.7267BDA82B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ef5fec60708160634w5a7731f6i83c85930e20bd891@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux)

> what may be useful is the transparent TCP proxy support in Tor for
> ensuring the VPN connections are going through Tor. (VPN software
> being difficult to SOCKS'ify so to speak)

Ahem... if your VPN software is using TCP rather than UDP or raw IP,
then I strongly recommend that you choose a different VPN vendor.

Which means that until Roger, Nick and their basementful of slaves
implement a datagram transport for tor, it will not be possible to run
a well-designed VPN over tor.

                                        Juliusz

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Privoxy usage?
  - From: coderman

References:
- Privoxy usage?
  - From: nobledark
- Re: Privoxy usage?
  - From: coderman

Prev by Author: Re: Directory issues
Next by Author: Re: Privoxy usage?
Previous by thread: Re: Privoxy usage?
Next by thread: Re: Privoxy usage?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread