[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Block hidden services
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Block hidden services
- From: "F. Fox" <kitsune.or@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:15:19 -0700
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:15:58 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Zg38w9ha4SfSnKCgc0pg1r7sqNWLV/AMX7eHA9vNp/c=; b=N44EREjL4qeZUT8NOW7fPUT5O0P4StQn1oJIiS8KuJLGqbLA80rzm2daAIK76B3hH6 DrGApldZBfeHOnwxkQVVgqu/TdCMGTzqQV+xI785r9/FO2sp4bIFoQ94m6foijERy4Ud nXJ1xPjqPxpfepi3wMU2jD859Djg4GaHD6g9s=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=bBuXOh4jlAbN2VkUaPXaB42wIXzSxbBFAXq4EmI1COCjKIrI0cAzjpPN5tj7inEpzm 985/quN3JN6Q6nTeALb4Nk5hmdxv1k7JhjluX3yFviqQCYP173Xt2t+KosaRc/qPpRef eewebgP+TKVPyjCnHfYCP4GNBqcm1/aryAeA0=
- In-reply-to: <200808290544.47908.xiando@xxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <5B1AE095-48A1-4E41-B67D-2F23F95A086E@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200808290544.47908.xiando@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
xiando wrote:
>> is it - in analogy to exit policies - possible to block certain (or
>
>> all) hidden services of using my node as directory or introduction
>
>> point and to disable rendezvous point functionality for my node? (I
>
>> understand that I cannot block being a rendezvous point for specific
>
>> hidden services.)
>
>>
>
>> If not, I vote for such a feature.
>
> I strongly disagree with your vote for such a feature. There may be
> anonymity issues involved. Your refusal to have involvement with hidden
> service introduction may ease the adversarys attempts to locale my
> hidden service and identify me as the operator.
>
At the very least, such a new feature - if introduced - should be
opt-in; by default, a node should have the ability to be an introduction
or rendezvous point.
FWIW, it's not possible for a node to differentiate between proxy and
hidden-service traffic for relay purposes; this has been discussed before.
- --
F. Fox
Owner of Tor node "kitsune"
http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com
Note 2008/08/19: I lost my old GPG keypair, and have generated a new
one. Authenticity can be verified by checking the ContactInfo on kitsune.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=xAbI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----