[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Padding again Was: Practical web-site-specific traffic analyses

On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...
> The overhead of padding schemes that I've seen, either end to end
> type, or hop-based for free routed networks as presented above, are
> simply too large to be practical.

perhaps DLP with SFQ and datagram transport. could even add endpoint
mobility / multi-path for resilience. (it sounds so easy ;)

practical can be surprisingly forgiving if the protections are compelling.

 you could build it and find out...
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/