[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Padding again Was: Practical web-site-specific traffic analyses

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Padding again Was: Practical web-site-specific traffic analyses
From: coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 21:20:47 -0700
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:20:52 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=F/GVA8S5W88OktJ3s8jNyHw/HFSJiGGhaZTZ4ruKCOQ=; b=gYE7xJi6z5giheq9LO2rUdvyVysA1DNszRSOCEgaSyHMw+SJDVqn3dqfRLYl5GLcgo AWcJpn1znJrhv0dNFF8dCydfPeov7DrCEZrGhiN5FNl/dCyf3gDcnGTYkKUmYDO6IxRP ZyOp9F5SXjDkkX/SN1bz4Kfmd0srTwJysz+H4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=vgvg//IJUIS3CoZm7qFztEkHHtKLO+9oec5yPn/E9VgyKFYNZ73e0rv/QKRj0ZlSY7 cAzpLd6oZBx5sp8lUH7bNBjMzL06jumZJnCfbMN421C3DObbmEyRcLmzPH6bwZYB0jtu 1mV5YyMqCvxoLAN31wdzTh2XMXXU6VgM9Hn08=
In-reply-to: <AANLkTingTngvNrEu7r8NTzndRwVeC-hqpaJkEO6XWntj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <AANLkTingTngvNrEu7r8NTzndRwVeC-hqpaJkEO6XWntj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...
> The overhead of padding schemes that I've seen, either end to end
> type, or hop-based for free routed networks as presented above, are
> simply too large to be practical.

perhaps DLP with SFQ and datagram transport. could even add endpoint
mobility / multi-path for resilience. (it sounds so easy ;)

practical can be surprisingly forgiving if the protections are compelling.

 you could build it and find out...
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/

References:
- Padding again Was: Practical web-site-specific traffic analyses
  - From: Gregory Maxwell

Prev by Author: Re: Google and Tor.
Next by Author: Re: Tor + SELinux sandbox = leak proof without VM overhead?
Previous by thread: Padding again Was: Practical web-site-specific traffic analyses
Next by thread: Re: Padding again Was: Practical web-site-specific traffic analyses
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread