Re: [tor-talk] Anonymizing middlebox - What's the function of VirtualAddrNetwork config option?

[Noel Pluny <noel_pluny@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 05:39:29PM +0000, adrelanos wrote:

Sorry for the delay but it is august.....

> > I read these articles but at this time I don't think they will apply to my
> > situation because this is a "friendly" one.
> 
> I don't understand.

I don't really need a captive portal because I can talk by mouth to every user
of our access point. It is more clear?

> > We need only a way not to need to
> > save logs.
> 
> Not sure I understand either.
> 
> You are obligated by law to keep logs of people using your... Your what?
> Your wifi hotspot?
> 
> In this case Anonymizing Middlebox probable wouldn't be of any help.
> Proxying the users doesn't mostly free your from any laws to log.
> Depends on local laws.

What we are looking for is a way to loose every link between _every_ user of our
access point and the communication log, not forcing every user to install tor on
single device connected.

Yes, I used wrong words but sorry for my bad english.

-- 
Noel Pluny
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk