Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

[Andrew Lewman <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:38:13 +0200
"Randolph D." <rdohm321@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello
> there is preparation draft work done to get the vidalia Qt plugin out
> for the TorBrowser based on Dooble Web Browser 1.35 with lots of
> security improvments.
> Is there something to change on the drafted website?
> 
> http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/
> 
> Can the Tor Onion be shown in the First Feature Box?

I refer to https://www.torproject.org/docs/trademark-faq.html.en. 
Calling it 'Tor Browser' is a bad idea. 

I appreciate the flattery with the imitation from the real torproject
site, but get creative and come up with something that is your own--not
a verbatim copy of the look and feel designed to confuse users.

Rather than working on the html and a bunch of unknown plugins, spend
more time working on the actual design[0], risks, and empirical evidence
showing dooble in the tor browser is more anonymous than the current
torbrowser with firefox. And no, a simple 's/firefox/dooble/' in that
design doc doesn't count as real work.

[0]
https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser/design/

-- 
Andrew
http://tpo.is/contact
pgp 0x6B4D6475
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk