[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Why make bad-relays a closed mailing list?

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Why make bad-relays a closed mailing list?
From: Nusenu <BM-2D8wMEVgGVY76je1WXNPfo8SrpZt5yGHES@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 21:11:29 +0000
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 17:11:49 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=bitmessage.ch; s=mail; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:References; bh=1bmPUHSWwIoXLOgiYGXMe1NTxDKbovFNtaWl8gA0pCQ=; b=hZVMufxluKQYAv8yjUKToNsxmtsopyYvzegRYYTxFazhNIxmIKf8KTEbsPQp0N1tgGNOdb1yIvljK+2d46mx80T8KVeeEun+6FPH2ySwFF5e/0zO1SwsNVZaEqzMWVMBYB9useo7cM+TGwt6aQqy+X1nr1ju4xUPSxhJHlwO+wI=
In-reply-to: <CAJdkzEPVj0uniR3b7-pkzFj7XHoxKwciif6-0vzJ0PQyG3XAxg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <53D980B1.9020009@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140731002741.GB16023@xxxxxxxxx> <53DA9757.2050602@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140731201233.GA23456@xxxxxxxxx> <20140731203519.GF8819@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAJdkzEMCf8tc3phdckJhUq0sz0VkGd8oXSGTWJ2OEVfAJpgQHA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <53DBDA4A.5010008@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAJdkzEPVj0uniR3b7-pkzFj7XHoxKwciif6-0vzJ0PQyG3XAxg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

>>> Does anyone want to argue against making who we flag and why 
>>> public?
>> 
>> Would be great to also hear about
>> 
>> "Does anyone want to argue against making who we reject 
>> (AuthDirReject) and why public?" (if the above question doesn't
>> include that already)
> 
> It does. Rejection is just another scenario of flagging a bad
> relay. I see no point in discussing rejection separately.

Great, thanks for clarifying this point.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=65xb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

References:
- Re: [tor-talk] Why make bad-relays a closed mailing list?
  - From: Damian Johnson
- Re: [tor-talk] Why make bad-relays a closed mailing list?
  - From: Nusenu
- Re: [tor-talk] Why make bad-relays a closed mailing list?
  - From: Damian Johnson

Prev by Author: [tor-talk] new tab in tbb (cli)
Next by Author: [tor-talk] 'relay early' attack logging at the infrastructure level?
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Why make bad-relays a closed mailing list?
Next by thread: [tor-talk] TorCitadel: Testers with RaspberryPi needed for torified network of mail/jabber servers
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread