[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
More Wiki coverage, but getting further off-topic
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: More Wiki coverage, but getting further off-topic
- From: Marc Abel <m-abel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:16:39 -0500
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:16:59 -0500
- In-reply-to: <20051123170718.GS2249@leitl.org>
- References: <20051123101700.GV2249@leitl.org> <886277B5-3FC1-4150-8FB6-3D223AB22BA3@mac.com> <20051123170718.GS2249@leitl.org>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051215/ap_on_hi_te/wikipedia_accuracy
"Wikipedia, the encyclopedia that relies on volunteers to pen nearly 4
million articles, is about as accurate in covering scientific topics as
Encyclopedia Britannica, the journal Nature wrote in an online article
published Wednesday."
Not bad considering the security issues.