[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [declan@well.com: [Politech] E.U. Parliament votes to force "data retention" on telecom, Net firms [priv]]

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [declan@well.com: [Politech] E.U. Parliament votes to force "data retention" on telecom, Net firms [priv]]
From: Marc Abel <m-abel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:18:37 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:19:04 -0500
In-reply-to: <20051215161858.GH2249@leitl.org>
References: <20051214173324.GI2249@leitl.org> <20051215010042.GA8306@nao.deadbox.ath.cx> <200512150120.24483.jbloss@tampabay.rr.com> <20051215073506.GW22994@localhost.localdomain> <20051215082916.GM2249@leitl.org> <20051215100615.GA27830@totoro.wangafu.net> <20051215104625.GP2249@leitl.org> <1598245629.20051215180821@gmail.com> <20051215161858.GH2249@leitl.org>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

This has been a popular subject of late.  At speeds under 20 KB/sec, I
suggest a pop-up message:

     "Thank you for your interest in becoming a bottleneck."




On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 11:18, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> Not if the client/server recognizes it's on dialup, and won't participate in
> the network. Dialup nodes = bad nodes.

Follow-Ups:
- Re[2]: [declan@well.com: [Politech] E.U. Parliament votes to force "data retention" on telecom, Net firms [priv]]
  - From: Arrakistor

References:
- [declan@well.com: [Politech] E.U. Parliament votes to force "data retention" on telecom, Net firms [priv]]
  - From: Eugen Leitl
- Re: [declan@well.com: [Politech] E.U. Parliament votes to force "data retention" on telecom, Net firms [priv]]
  - From: nile
- Re: [declan@well.com: [Politech] E.U. Parliament votes to force "data retention" on telecom, Net firms [priv]]
  - From: Jeffrey F. Bloss
- Re: [declan@well.com: [Politech] E.U. Parliament votes to force "data retention" on telecom, Net firms [priv]]
  - From: Roger Dingledine
- Re: [declan@well.com: [Politech] E.U. Parliament votes to force "data retention" on telecom, Net firms [priv]]
  - From: Eugen Leitl
- Re: [declan@well.com: [Politech] E.U. Parliament votes to force "data retention" on telecom, Net firms [priv]]
  - From: Nick Mathewson
- Re: [declan@well.com: [Politech] E.U. Parliament votes to force "data retention" on telecom, Net firms [priv]]
  - From: Eugen Leitl
- Re[2]: [declan@well.com: [Politech] E.U. Parliament votes to force "data retention" on telecom, Net firms [priv]]
  - From: yGREK heretix
- Re: [declan@well.com: [Politech] E.U. Parliament votes to force "data retention" on telecom, Net firms [priv]]
  - From: Eugen Leitl

Prev by Author: More Wiki coverage, but getting further off-topic
Next by Author: Re: recent tor stream timeout errors...
Previous by thread: Re: [declan@well.com: [Politech] E.U. Parliament votes to force "data retention" on telecom, Net firms [priv]]
Next by thread: Re[2]: [declan@well.com: [Politech] E.U. Parliament votes to force "data retention" on telecom, Net firms [priv]]
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread