[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: UDP and data retention

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: UDP and data retention
From: Eugen Leitl <eugen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:00:36 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:00:49 -0500
In-reply-to: <bd9056300812190323vbd2e027wb45b020fb26388c9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20081219102401.GW11544@xxxxxxxxx> <bd9056300812190323vbd2e027wb45b020fb26388c9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:23:25PM +0100, slush wrote:
> 
>    No.

This monosyllabic answer no doubt comes from in-depth knowledge
of legal requirements in regards to data retention for ISPs in Germany?

>    2008/12/19 Eugen Leitl <[1]eugen@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
>      This is off-topic, but isn't UDP making data retention more
>      difficult
>      than TCP/IP.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: UDP and data retention
  - From: Paul Syverson

References:
- UDP and data retention
  - From: Eugen Leitl
- Re: UDP and data retention
  - From: slush

Prev by Author: UDP and data retention
Next by Author: Re: UDP and data retention
Previous by thread: Re: UDP and data retention
Next by thread: Re: UDP and data retention
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread