[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: UDP and data retention

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: UDP and data retention
From: Paul Syverson <syverson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:05:52 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:07:58 -0500
In-reply-to: <20081219120036.GX11544@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <20081219102401.GW11544@xxxxxxxxx> <bd9056300812190323vbd2e027wb45b020fb26388c9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081219120036.GX11544@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 01:00:36PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:23:25PM +0100, slush wrote:
> > 
> >    No.
> 
> This monosyllabic answer no doubt comes from in-depth knowledge
> of legal requirements in regards to data retention for ISPs in Germany?
>  
Yes.

> >    2008/12/19 Eugen Leitl <[1]eugen@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> >      This is off-topic, but isn't UDP making data retention more
> >      difficult
> >      than TCP/IP.


(Sorry couldn't help myself. And sorry I don't have a substantive
answer to your question. -Paul)

References:
- UDP and data retention
  - From: Eugen Leitl
- Re: UDP and data retention
  - From: slush
- Re: UDP and data retention
  - From: Eugen Leitl

Prev by Author: No network-status consensus
Next by Author: Circuits and connections qu
Previous by thread: Re: UDP and data retention
Next by thread: Re: UDP and data retention
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread