[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: TOR and ISP

To: Scott Bennett <bennett@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TOR and ISP
From: Seth David Schoen <schoen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 22:59:53 -0800
Cc: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Seth David Schoen <schoen@xxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:59:58 -0500
In-reply-to: <200912270552.nBR5qrU0010126@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200912270552.nBR5qrU0010126@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

Scott Bennett writes:

>      On the contrary, in the United States, all ISPs are *required* by
> statute to record all URL requests that can be detected passing from their
> customers through their equipment.

What statute requires this?

-- 
Seth Schoen
Staff Technologist                                schoen@xxxxxxx
Electronic Frontier Foundation                    http://www.eff.org/
454 Shotwell Street, San Francisco, CA  94110     +1 415 436 9333 x107
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: TOR and ISP
  - From: andrew
- Re: TOR and ISP
  - From: Programmer In Training

References:
- Re: TOR and ISP
  - From: Scott Bennett

Prev by Author: Re: TOR and ISP
Next by Author: RE: [OFF LIST] Re: attempt from Taiwan to connect to my privoxy port
Previous by thread: Re: TOR and ISP
Next by thread: Re: TOR and ISP
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread