[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] tor-talk Digest, Vol 59, Issue 13
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS IS ALL ABOUT: tor-talk mailing list.
Could you please explain this to me in a not scientific language and to
tell me what I have to do to be protected?
Thanks in advance.
2015-12-11 7:00 GMT-05:00 <tor-talk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Send tor-talk mailing list submissions to
> tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> tor-talk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> tor-talk-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of tor-talk digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: single entity running >36% exit probability with 5
> relays? scary. (meejah)
> 2. Save Crypto: Tell the White House We Can't Sacrifice Security
> (grarpamp)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 02:35:36 +0400
> From: meejah <meejah@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] single entity running >36% exit probability
> with 5 relays? scary.
> Message-ID: <86k2omx77r.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> It seems there's "some" interest in upgrading TorFlow? I can't in good
> conscience say that -- without funding -- I alone can replace it -- but
> I do have an out-of-date txtorcon exit-relay scanning system that could
> *become* a "next gen" torflow.
>
> I am ready and willing to provide mentorship to make this happen.
>
> >From my perspective, the best-case would be a motivated and knowledeble
> student or intermediate programmer who is self-motivated and already
> versed in event-based programming (ideally Twisted, but asyncio,
> node.js, boost's asio or others are great too).
>
> IMO, the best thing would be for authority operators to enumerate on a
> wiki page or ticket a) their requirements and b) their issues with
> TorFlow. Or, I guess, c) torflow is amazing and meejah has the wrong
> impression :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> meejah
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 03:46:48 -0500
> From: grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cypherpunks@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [tor-talk] Save Crypto: Tell the White House We Can't
> Sacrifice Security
> Message-ID:
> <
> CAD2Ti29Ov7aavXEDfgmA+5kaGZM0WwDPhOms7oiaX9NWz6zW2A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
>
> https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/12/save-crypto-tell-white-house-we-cant-sacrifice-security
>
> https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/publicly-affirm-your-support-strong-encryption
> https://www.whitehouse.gov/webform/share-your-thoughts-onstrong-encryption
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of tor-talk Digest, Vol 59, Issue 13
> ****************************************
>
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk