[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: ExitPolicy abuse

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: ExitPolicy abuse
From: SK <sk.list@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:04:41 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 04:07:16 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=euqGxdJijeW4oUG5IsMEbPB0LzQckqsGL4dW1bGWJgRqVPA2wSZE4gaSGg/hElPscv0PwUlY12rJrCFiRANldcEqe5k1YlGFjcTAkS5BQcA/JVHBAPTpe67qwtvJPOD8y9AyizEe5SWKTbl/ccel4jreUsNkyIkE+XiYfDWNbAs=
In-reply-to: <3b793f1a050209144021749ac7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ea4f23c2d16ada8345e8dfd8069e46b5@wiw.org> <6ca73f6505020901317d2ce167@mail.gmail.com> <20050209184015.GG19434@eff.org> <3b793f1a050209144021749ac7@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

And what is the flaw? Providing an HTTP interface to the Usenet?

SK

On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:40:02 -0500, Kero-Chan <kerochan2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The abuse is because of the security flaws in Usenet/GoogleGroups, and
> not because of tor. Forcing a tor server to shut down because of this
> (even if the mail and the abuse are verified) is illegal. It's like
> closing a thief's mother in prison "because she gave birth to a
> criminal".
>

Follow-Ups:
- statistics
  - From: Bernhard Wiedemann
- Re: ExitPolicy abuse
  - From: phobos

References:
- ExitPolicy abuse
  - From: Christopher Heschong
- Re: ExitPolicy abuse
  - From: SK
- Re: ExitPolicy abuse
  - From: Chris Palmer
- Re: ExitPolicy abuse
  - From: Kero-Chan

Prev by Author: Re: ExitPolicy abuse
Next by Author: Look at that size!
Previous by thread: Re: ExitPolicy abuse
Next by thread: Re: ExitPolicy abuse
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread