[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: for those not allowing exiting - reasonably safe ports

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: for those not allowing exiting - reasonably safe ports
From: Daniel <mysticone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:51:00 -0600
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 20:51:35 -0500
In-reply-to: <20060201191900.3fa7961d.patgus@stonewwwall.org>
References: <20060201191900.3fa7961d.patgus@stonewwwall.org>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051201)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

You might want to also add 5222 and 5223 for Jabber and 1863 for MSN if
you're trying to allow your node to be an exit for IM clients.

Daniel

patgus wrote:
>  I have a list here of ports used by AIM, Yahoo, & ICQ messaging programs.
> I think these should be reasonably safe for anyone to allow without having to deal with abuse issues. This should also free up a little bandwith.
> 
> 5050
> 5101
> 5190
> 5191
> 5192
> 5193
> 
> 
>  Anyone have anything else to add to the list or any comments?
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD4WWEwumGY7kXWaMRAq+DAJ0RaIwXtgCzd6nyjhw9weebPGPc1wCgggeE
IawsVv4BW+qPZdcZb7XePt4=
=QUVl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: for those not allowing exiting - reasonably safe ports
  - From: Glymr Darkmoon

References:
- for those not allowing exiting - reasonably safe ports
  - From: patgus

Prev by Author: Re: Running a Tor exit node on an academic network?
Next by Author: Re: for those not allowing exiting - reasonably safe ports
Previous by thread: for those not allowing exiting - reasonably safe ports
Next by thread: Re: for those not allowing exiting - reasonably safe ports
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread