[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Compromised entry guards rejecting safe circuits (was Re: OSI 1-3 attack on Tor? in it.wikipedia)

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Compromised entry guards rejecting safe circuits (was Re: OSI 1-3 attack on Tor? in it.wikipedia)
From: "Florian D." <flockmock@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:59:32 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:59:41 -0500
In-reply-to: <47B749C0.2020102@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <839947.65753.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47B749C0.2020102@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071117)

Ben Wilhelm wrote:
> (snipped cool stuff)
> 

thanks a lot for your shrewd and amusing explanations. I would not
mind, if this discussion would go on like that for a while ;)
cheers, florian

References:
- Re: Compromised entry guards rejecting safe circuits (was Re: OSI 1-3 attack on Tor? in it.wikipedia)
  - From: Anon Mus
- Re: Compromised entry guards rejecting safe circuits (was Re: OSI 1-3 attack on Tor? in it.wikipedia)
  - From: Ben Wilhelm

Prev by Author: Re: A root-server for about 30EUR for an exitnode?
Next by Author: Re: About WLAN and monitoring..
Previous by thread: Re: Compromised entry guards rejecting safe circuits (was Re: OSI 1-3 attack on Tor? in it.wikipedia)
Next by thread: Re: Compromised entry guards rejecting safe circuits (was Re: OSI 1-3 attack on Tor? in it.wikipedia)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread