[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: lefkada down
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: lefkada down
- From: Hans Schnehl <torvallenator@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:42:49 +0100
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:43:08 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=xLbSVcvb6iCJollMBj/l5+OOCLLxp/1w7SiTWcrhnQk=; b=ML2F24ffo0QB8YvUpf314N0RBOhxcGIx4zR5KvP42CYcfmEyDUbqqhVbBQckO+ek7PCbuhVF8BJYQ6Lky/L47LVuuhAIlfZbxq/KGHUuqW/rhyj1oGlfM7wy2BhWcdCs1Yr1AaYvWF/iuQHr67wwzVmpl4vfv/c4CvF5iJYPm0w=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=N6cweojrDTNfLe4az2piIGMyclgEqRZHITPJR6BJj+XPrsk2Pfeqd5O08CZMHzc0Q8JrPkxdyX+hJQcbS8yAzzjg8n+SyaMohj3zEEDQDQlaAdm8yJyqg5yzBg5UCWyEsFOBZBkDLJWwJNN3Zo7YByI0SzpynxO6slkU8WFsfnk=
- In-reply-to: <20080229100654.GQ4453@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <20080229093818.GB21838@tabulara> <20080229100654.GQ4453@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 05:06:54AM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:38:18AM +0100, Hans Schnehl wrote:
> > Feb 29 08:21:07.148 [info] router_set_networkstatus_v2(): Not replacing network-status
> > from directory server "lefkada" at 140.247.60.64:80 (published 2008-02-22 19:07:05);
> > we already have it.
> > [snip...]
>
> Right, Lefkada's been down for nearly a week. Its owner is working
> on that. Good thing we have other directory authorities. :)
>
> > Consequently only four of five authorities listed in cached-status matched a current
> > network-status since about one week.
> [snip]
> > Now there are only four authorities listed. Maybe hard to find a majority there ?
> >
> > All this on Tor v0.2.0.20-rc-dev (r13725).
>
> You are a little bit confused. Tor 0.2.0.x uses the new v3 directory
Yes, I remember this was told in my life before ;)
> system, which means it looks at ~/.tor/cached-consensus. The
> ~/.tor/cached-status/ directory is just for mirroring v2 networkstatus
> documents to the Tor users that are running 0.1.2.x.
>
> Hope that helps,
> --Roger
>
Thanks for clearing.
Hans