[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: another reason to keep ExcludeNodes


On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Scott Bennett <bennett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>     In the particular case I was describing, the node that was consistently
> appearing in the circuits that cut off files happened not to be an exit in
> any of the failure cases.  IIRC, it was nearly always in a middleman position,
> though I think there was a day when it was an entry guard.

Middle node can change payload without next node noticing that? There
is not checksuming/signing in the process?