[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: freenode irc, tor, and sasl
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: freenode irc, tor, and sasl
- From: Ted Smith <teddks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:31:02 -0500
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:31:14 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to :references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=KhOKZDdHJUVcJOOriuz4lEH4bssS/0uQeWINmFT/Bdc=; b=Udyx7JzKgPb+GXtCg/pqZJXK17u1+iKppw1WaieK1zIIpxw3nh7nJwiw7yO0E68JMf 8Ywro+GkVHKTJTHyeUcXH+LH5ckD7FP4fhfdzruujNkCe+BhdB4razD9YeYVR/C05CBa 1AZ4x/Joir1t+rVuRg0QCZBHvTKcrb6g2j1fI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer; b=qNzHZukd6ZvUQMsvzGYL3nIYtPfOoKrjOVXGcLvvI17xi4AkPMi9HyUVmP5PdYD0kf QO+PRhKgK0g92MO+DERSgkmveNXIo+kMk39wbhQC0WXBdrZfY9gs7zR/APwik/koI5HO oT+nqgbpL986wMLOgOvuN4ruQ24VIj5M87dUo=
- In-reply-to: <20100218061543.GL3407@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <20100218061543.GL3407@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 01:15 -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> http://blog.freenode.net/2010/01/connecting-to-freenode-using-tor-sasl/
>
> It looks like the freenode irc channel is trying a new approach for
> handling its Tor users. (This is great, since for a long time it looked
> like they were planning to just let Tor users slowly starve to death.)
>
> Has anybody played with it? What did you think?
It breaks the Tor IM Bundle, for starters. And it seems like the only
supported free client is irssi, which is a definite lose for usability.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part