[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?
From: Olaf Selke <olaf.selke@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:13:22 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:13:25 -0500
In-reply-to: <AANLkTim1107a6BuDt-Dg2YWNnCscNm4i5c7MTo+gK7Pr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <201102100149.p1A1nai0016735@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTiknoE8NJ-KkzzwBeGQMp-xROm3gJ3DYpChTQdvR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110211022903.GL2550@xxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTi=kk0QNrHPpm+4LFzrbEGcYWWSJySeDvUib2g6A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTim1107a6BuDt-Dg2YWNnCscNm4i5c7MTo+gK7Pr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7

Am 14.02.2011 14:41, schrieb morphium:
> So, with everything said, could we now please Un-BadExit the nodes
> that were affected?

the whole discussion didn't change my mind. I still support the idea of
flagging them as bad exit.

regards Olaf
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?
  - From: Damian Johnson

References:
- Re: Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?
  - From: Scott Bennett
- Re: Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?
  - From: grarpamp
- Re: Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?
  - From: Mike Perry
- Re: Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?
  - From: grarpamp
- Re: Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?
  - From: morphium

Prev by Author: Re: Macports tor broken?
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] Two questions about tor status
Previous by thread: Re: Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?
Next by thread: Re: Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread