[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] Tor bridge with no traffic
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:43:40 +0000, Christian Kujau wrote:
...
> But, isn't this a problem? Porxying through tor is slow enough and when I
> was running an exit node, there was lots of traffic there.
Of course. Exit nodes are scarce, and 'normal' relays (at least mine)
did pick up quite some traffic after a few days.
> When bridges
> are not "announced", no one will use them - sounds like a real bottleneck.
They are announced, just not all to the general public. You have to tell
your tor client to use bridges; normally it directly talks to (public) relays.
I think it's a relatively small fraction that is actually using bridges;
if yours ended up in the pool for manual/social distribution it may
take some time until anybody comes around.
> Is there some other way to announce the bridge?
I don't think it is a good idea to twitter the address. :-)
Andreas
--
"Totally trivial. Famous last words."
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk