slrner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > >Although I can use TOR directly, I am having difficulty incorporating > >privoxy. I am using OpenBSD 3.6, Firefox 0.8, TOR 0.0.9.2, and > >privoxy 3.0.2.1. TOR is compiled locally, and privoxy and Firefox > >are the pre-compiled binary packages shipped with the OpenBSD > >distribution. You got Firefox to work on OpenBSD 3.6? You lucky dog. :) It fails hilariously for me. > >If I enable privoxy as well as TOR, the first one or 2 selected links > >will download, and thereafter it will hang forever. The fact that it > >works for a few links suggests to me that the configuration is > >correct. Yes, I got the same result with Konqueror -> Privoxy -> Tor on OpenBSD 3.6. In my case, Privoxy reliably saw and logged the first three requests given it by Konqueror, but nothing after that. This was the case both when Privoxy was configured to use Tor and when not so configured. > First, a comment to help the second person using OpenBSD with TOR > (apparently, I am the first). As a client, I only tried it last night. But I've been running Tor as a server on OpenBSD with good results for 9 months or so. I think the thing to do is bring it up with the maintainer of the OpenBSD Privoxy port. Looking at /usr/ports/www/privoxy/Makefile, I see the maintainer is listed as Dan Weeks <danimal@xxxxxxxxxxx>. He happens to be a friend of mine and I know for a fact that he has renounced all OBSD port maintainership. So Privoxy for OpenBSD is currently unmaintained. Roger, stop laughing! -- Chris Palmer Technology Manager, Electronic Frontier Foundation 415 436 9333 x124 (desk), 415 305 5842 (cell) 81C0 E11D CE73 4390 B6C7 3415 B286 CD8F 68E4 09CD
Attachment:
pgpoyJr6sJJkd.pgp
Description: PGP signature