[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Child pornography blocking again

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Child pornography blocking again
From: "F. Fox" <kitsune.or@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:51:01 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:51:13 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vgG9NAcZgWkQLsmdOtFaykoRsXZFHqugsjLo5Cr/sdQ=; b=L8XfLlegY9I2Ph9fHMEgQPBPAkV4zHsPcFtZR6hWLQyJtGTzJvErU89+xCzDf+saLgLO23Kq5Z2gW3dLteC9ec7N8hNsjBuYANaQWacHxTmn7QgvFvukEyvC55GzkXUmtjOJeXcEd9htHesb1RJyWWNp+dvkHPsP+ZIyLZKH9nw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gC9lmkID4+xsLSlltdR6iIVRgGlMOsz8nla2OYPENQMva7NHKDmK7tCaTPMO+sW+TEHM2D0/7Jz3Z913oCKBtT8vEG3QWdPvm9+MumLc8c5/MbTW5ofV2RT8JLFi9g2BAy9/bgBPGIUvwSoLxP6KqwSCrMRQfvblSnyAeJWGEAo=
In-reply-to: <620d63820801250118v34a55da1qb023a62753f7f626@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <620d63820801240438o369f5fddkc0596f5fef24ece3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f0eeea310801240444p67b6463cs2b460ce9d24b01e3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <620d63820801240453o23b07a16o88d4b1f6d72c8079@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47988E96.40408@xxxxxxxxx> <620d63820801241911u4f6f4bf0yf1d964b687287352@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080125080311.GJ10128@xxxxxxxxx> <620d63820801250118v34a55da1qb023a62753f7f626@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Icedove 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071018)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Kraktus wrote:
> On 25/01/2008, Eugen Leitl <eugen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I just want to know if there is a technically feasible way of
>> Use your brain. Packets have no EVIL bit to test for.
> 
> I'm pretty sure my suggestion is better than an RFC April Fools' Joke.
> 

Hehe, I like that: RFC for the EVIL bit. Designed to stop all manner of
online crime. =xoD

- --
F. Fox: A+, Network+, Security+
Owner of Tor node "kitsune"
http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=s0xk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Child pornography blocking again
  - From: Kraktus

References:
- Child pornography blocking again
  - From: Kraktus
- Re: Child pornography blocking again
  - From: Nils Vogels
- Re: Child pornography blocking again
  - From: Kraktus
- Re: Child pornography blocking again
  - From: Paul Henning
- Re: Child pornography blocking again
  - From: Kraktus
- Re: Child pornography blocking again
  - From: Eugen Leitl
- Re: Child pornography blocking again
  - From: Kraktus

Prev by Author: Re: Child pornography blocking again
Next by Author: Re: Child pornography blocking again
Previous by thread: Re: Child pornography blocking again
Next by thread: Re: Child pornography blocking again
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread