[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: directory authority/authorities need(s) updating?

     On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:27:01 +0100 Andrew <tor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Scott Bennett wrote:
>|      Last night I reported here that the directory authorities are in
>| disagreement over client-versions and server-versions.  Tonight they are
>| still in disagreement.  The consensus documents still fail to list any
>| development branch versions later than as server-versions.
>|      When will the directory authority operators correct these two 
>The same notice shows up in my log after installing a fresh Tor 
> (r13293) around noon today.

     The latest consensus file appears to have listed as
a recommended server version, but not or,
even though it still lists,, and  Also, the individual status documents are still in
considerable disagreement with each other.  Are the directory authority
operators getting careless?

>By the way, if anyone cares: as of today, my node "cerebellum" is back 
>up! Only as a relay for now, but better a fast relay than nothing, right?
     Welcome back!

                                  Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
* Internet:       bennett at cs.niu.edu                              *
* "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good  *
* objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
* -- a standing army."                                               *
*    -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790         *