[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: directory authority/authorities need(s) updating?

Scott Bennett schrieb:
The latest consensus file appears to have listed as
a recommended server version, but not or,
even though it still lists,, and  Also, the individual status documents are still in
considerable disagreement with each other.  Are the directory authority
operators getting careless?
Mhmm. I think, 16-alpha missed a file in the release and 17-alpha had a huge memory leak, I think, it is sane no to recommend them. 18-alpha is different, but it is quite new, I would not be surprised if it is recommended not until a few days in the wild, but I don't know the policy about that.