[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: On the performance scalability of Tor

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: On the performance scalability of Tor
From: Mike Perry <mikeperry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:52:14 -0700
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:52:22 -0400
In-reply-to: <20070719024334.GA1226@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20070718145816.GX4473@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200707190025.30186.robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070719024334.GA1226@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i

Thus spake Mike Perry (mikeperry@xxxxxxxxxx):

> RELAY_EXTEND is the way this is done. I believe clients can and do
> send multiple RELAY_EXTENDs in a row, so it's not like its a

Sorry, I'm a moron. I meant to say RELAY_BEGIN. Also, Roger/Nick,
please correct me if these can't be issued concurrently.


-- 
Mike Perry
Mad Computer Scientist
fscked.org evil labs

Attachment: pgpNEnc8vXSBC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: On the performance scalability of Tor
  - From: Roger Dingledine

References:
- On the performance scalability of Tor
  - From: Steven Murdoch
- Re: On the performance scalability of Tor
  - From: Robert Hogan
- Re: On the performance scalability of Tor
  - From: Mike Perry

Prev by Author: Re: On the performance scalability of Tor
Next by Author: Re: On the performance scalability of Tor
Previous by thread: Re: On the performance scalability of Tor
Next by thread: Re: On the performance scalability of Tor
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread