[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: concerning tor bug report #1026

To: Scott Bennett <bennett@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: concerning tor bug report #1026
From: Sebastian Hahn <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 18:10:00 +0200
Cc: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:10:04 -0400
In-reply-to: <200907071555.n67Ftg1g015030@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200907071555.n67Ftg1g015030@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


On Jul 7, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Scott Bennett wrote:

[snip]
    But *which* descriptor?  The last successful one?  Or the one that
failed?


They generate a new one, based on their current config options.

    BTW, thank you for looking at this so quickly.  This one indeed is
much less urgent than the one Nick already fixed for me, but it's good
to know that it is being investigated.


Sure. I have written a fix and handed it to Nick for review.

                                 Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG


Best
Sebastian

References:
- Re: concerning tor bug report #1026
  - From: Scott Bennett

Prev by Author: Re: concerning tor bug report #1026
Next by Author: firefox sage add-on
Previous by thread: Re: concerning tor bug report #1026
Next by thread: Re: concerning tor bug report #1026
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread