[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
There's no way to know for sure what the majority of Tor usage is in that
specific of a way
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Drew Fustini <pdp7pdp7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Good point - let me rephrase:
> I believe I've seen Roger and Jacob refute such claims that Tor
> traffic is all illegal activities, and I believe I've read posts in
> support of that. Unfortunately, I'm having trouble finding the
> appropriate links at the moment.
> I'd like to be able to say: the majority of Tor usage is positive for
> humanity and here's why...
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Tom van der Woerdt <info@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Drew Fustini schreef op 10/07/15 om 21:35:
> >> Greetings - I am a Tor Browser user and also an operator of a couple
> >> Tor relays. I believe the Tor Project has a noble mission.
> >> An online friend recently claimed to me that "amoral content is a huge
> >> portion of the exit node traffic". I believe by "amoral" he meant
> >> sexual exploitation. The conversation was sparked by my complaint
> >> that the new show "Mr. Robot" couldn't resist introducing Tor in the
> >> same breath as child porn.
> >> I don't believe that the majority of Tor traffic is "amoral", but I
> >> would like to find data to support my belief. Anyone know of such
> >> research or statistics?
> >> Thanks!
> >> Drew
> >> https://keybase.io/pdp7
> > Doing such research, where one would be snooping on Tor users' traffic
> > most likely without their consent, would be "amoral".
> > Tom
> > --
> > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to