[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
From: Juan <juan.g71@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:32:50 -0300
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:32:41 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4bkEsZ7R92W/0Rs1gMDgqhx8DAJ4HARRSnjzz5LE6Fo=; b=x5GMD6MRMr0bzyEM9KReQbeI1m55K42xEIns4xfiLZ6CcGiI8JobOJ/80KY+B78xGI yiRmG9ZjU1pSuactygkfzjsOWBT00KjsamM0qYU9zvGvFDqwL2ij+R6Ho7+HV263ioDJ U1IFjFulp/NNkDfvdonIRNbY7oSTbtihqUf0ZOFySUAi7/kKDhYiBE44R1gaanl6llh1 e7szBJI+ZihZBTJQOmMyyQ4mi60o/ZLkAk6aY08x00ip+RfXvX7TV9S5OOZ6tY5xw5/5 bboifqCHqABWjX+vL+2eVnHtLoPGczbITYAJT6mTZPko6tPa80N162Uhj6c4Em7nOose r/Fw==
In-reply-to: <CAJoS0DWDP=bJJugG7Z624ua9jZGbYpXtJ_PrBAGosVXQW9_tHA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAEf4M_B7o1k3JGFaqDJUSJnAoLLvW+fgj-OM_zWc21K92VLnaA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55A01F25.1010002@xxxxxxx> <CAEf4M_CNKETg_5cXv03JtgZ_HkyxfFP5M+1s+U0R3FigZXLcgA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55A029DD.2070301@xxxxxxxxxx> <CAJoS0DWDP=bJJugG7Z624ua9jZGbYpXtJ_PrBAGosVXQW9_tHA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:26:42 -0400
z9wahqvh <z9wahqvh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> far be it for me to agree with Juan,

	Of course. Doing so would result in your funding from the
	'department of defense' being cut off.

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
  - From: z9wahqvh

References:
- [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
  - From: Drew Fustini
- Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
  - From: Tom van der Woerdt
- Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
  - From: Drew Fustini
- Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
  - From: Speak Freely
- Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
  - From: z9wahqvh

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
Next by thread: Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread