Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military

[Alexandre Guillioud <guillioud.alexandre@xxxxxxxxx>]

I would risk a dumb question : how can it be 'controlled opposition" when
their (NSA) capacities to listen to whoever they want on tor havn't been
demonstrated nor refuted ?

Le mercredi 29 juillet 2015, Juan <juan.g71@xxxxxxxxx> a Ãcrit :

> On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:32:56 +0000
> Virgil Griffith <i@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
>
>
> >>      Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
> >>      ntending to use Tor for?
>
> me:
> >
> >
> > Exactly the same things they use it for right now.
> >
> >       Communications for their murdering operations, spying,
> >       propaganda.
> >
> >       Spread of american fascism.
>
>
>         addendum : a Pretty Good Name (PGN) and description for tor is
>         'controlled opposition'.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk