[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: nighteffect.us gone

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: nighteffect.us gone
From: Roger Dingledine <arma@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 00:15:15 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 00:15:30 -0400
In-reply-to: <464EF118.8070709@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <363852.70842.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <464EF118.8070709@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 02:44:08PM +0200, Olaf Selke wrote:
> Since port 80/tcp
> is already used by the tor application's DirPort, I'll need second ip
> address for this machine in order to have the Apache process listen at
> port 80. Maybe next week...

Actually, you can have Apache listen for Tor requests on port 80 and
pass them to the actual DirPort.

See the middle of
http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#ServerForFirewalledClients
for how to configure ProxyPass for your Apache.

--Roger

Follow-Ups:
- Re: nighteffect.us gone
  - From: Kasimir Gabert

Prev by Author: Re: nighteffect.us gone
Next by Author: Re: nighteffect.us gone
Previous by thread: Re: nighteffect.us gone
Next by thread: Re: nighteffect.us gone
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread