Re: [tor-talk] A possible solution to traffic correlation attacks,

[juan <juan.g71@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:48:22 -0500
CANNON NATHANIEL CIOTA <cannon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I know that Tor has stated in
> past that they don't claim to protect from a GPA. 


	Of course. Tor is purposely designed to allow the US military
	to spy on everyone. Obviously something to be expected since tor
	is owned by the US military.

 

> But we must realize
> that the true threat is a GPA which must be dealt with by
> collaborating on solutions to protect from global view traffic
> analysis. Another idea, if micro delays would not work out for low
> latency anonymizing networks such as Tor would be to perhaps add
> padding, randomized padding between each node. If micro-delays and/or
> padding is bad idea, then other solutions should be discussed.
> 

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk