Re: Fun NJ law proposed...

[Void Beast <daemonik.dragon@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ehehe... Look up phone phreaking...

Watson Ladd wrote:

> On 3/8/06, Matt Thorne <mlthorne@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  
>
> > you forgot the blue one.
> >    
> What blue box?
>  
>
> > On 3/6/06, Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >    
> >
> > > We are safe: This law is unconstitutional, and we have the boxes:
> > > Soap
> > > Ballot
> > > Jury
> > > Ammo
> > >
> > > Use in that order to defend liberty.
> > >
> > > On 3/6/06, Josh <huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >      
> > >
> > > > http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2006/Bills/A1500/1327_I1.HTM
> > > >
> > > > In particular, this part is scary:
> > > >
> > > > "In addition, the bill makes any operator or Internet service
> > > > provider liable for compensatory and punitive damages as well as
> > > > costs of a law suit filed by a person damaged by the posting of
> > > > such messages if the operator or Internet service provider fails
> > > > to establish, maintain and enforce the policy required by section
> > > > 2 of the bill."
> > > >
> > > > Well, the rest of it's scary, too... ;-)
> > > >
> > > > Josh
> > > >
> > > >        
> > > --
> > > "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
> > > Temporary Safety deserve neither  Liberty nor Safety."
> > > -- Benjamin Franklin
> > >
> > >      
>
>
> --
> "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
> Temporary Safety deserve neither  Liberty nor Safety."
> -- Benjamin Franklin
>