[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: When is a relay stable?
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: When is a relay stable?
- From: Ringo Kamens <2600denver@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:23:09 -0400
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:52:34 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rN3kU10fwkB6raI/ML0qK9zzZic4X1dbRIOtcjY4fYY=; b=OHsAVVo4TB7SO4BTQiKeq351dhPG3n+0UecGiWs7CN7tF6fMkg/zKnoyS4B1dCUAKP ypij5SJrh1NaKY91sJlzbwcXQTWqc7qkdrXaUrVsytlvE1gh76nI80x33CWa+ysKcAEz aZzXJmmvxbLXuQErfr1ZTbMsNw86+kac3BRZE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=i1zbpDsngj5I4zdxm2baigBd4/h+0hNJw4o2xbYsAWOAOy+QOw8+4EaGzSBU63ZeYy SyM4Zc3nLGe4nTErH+IiT3Zx4czXWrybSH0fBokTsTngzdUfEO7yT9avVOw+F4rSDOOp lk1Shqn1E6cbtZvLCyt0XvfVpvRSLCBA2QOW8=
- In-reply-to: <49BBA85C.7070504@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Openpgp: id=2739044E
- References: <49BBA85C.7070504@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105)
If I remember correctly, it is calculated by percentile. All the servers
have their uptime monitored and the highest 50% get marked as stable.
Ringo
Hans de Hartog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What are the criteria for a tor relay to be flagged as "stable" in the
> Tor Status pages?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Hans.
>