[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: hidden service with jabber and ssl
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: hidden service with jabber and ssl
- From: Ted Smith <teddks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:12:43 -0500
- Cc: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:12:53 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer; bh=tLam6MtqlZ/K+J5nbbYJJxLboo0tRt7XdiG9vAaAf98=; b=R74r2gQ7hg+NFCnitXQPUC7vOIJzn0QQEPewrd3+srvELzoLMud2pL2zYiN7NIvfkR 2kQJsnfSU+jllDApO1xaPpljPVayrl+rltzWM4Jr12Gq8ssLbLynj7s4Dvy1fyGQzsxb ABoBl4iNKhiLbjvDWRCm2pbhlvldYZTCiq1j4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=mSrj/jCt2Kt18RI/x9C8pLhZWIMNuLcs8hXiBE0ILl+rUPTQJrYpcs95Cu62lgpZSC qOl9ryQGZLmP8FF9BgWcqG18vhheCf53jOWFtKANYCv0N3JtKgZnwrH/r+kbjdqyQKDx WrhGBponR85+XfgjnEqhPPOYwo8V051pu9OZI=
- In-reply-to: <50748.1267635820@xxxxxxxxx>
- References: <50748.1267635820@xxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 18:03 +0100, moris blues wrote:
> i re that it is not secure to use a hidden service
> with ssl.
That's wrong. It might be superfluous at times, since you get end-to-end
crypto from Tor, but it's not at all insecure to use TLS/SSL on a hidden
service.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part