Hi FYI, I had a short discussion with some guys on the public shadowserver mailing list. Some of them are pretty fanatic indeed and say things like: ---8<--- TOR provides criminals with anonymous access to engage in criminal activity behind a cloak. TOR makes it exponentially more difficult to fight internet abuse. TOR operators are guilty by complicity. TOR is evil. --->8--- and ---8<--- TOR = abuse Running an endpoint should be illegal in itself. --->8--- In contrast, others are quite rational and explained that ---8<--- Our standard policy is to report what we see without any filtering. It is up to the receiving organization to determine what is the correct response. We do not dictate nor require any specific response from our reports. --->8--- I do see their point so I will try to talk to my ISP (once again...) Additionally, I will reject connections to the Shadowserver honeypots to avoid further abuse reports. This does not solve the fundamental conflict between Shadowserver and Tor, but it solves the problem for me and keeps my exit node hopefully up and running. best Alex
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk