Re: [tor-talk] obfs4proxy and ports < 1024

[Wanderingnet <wanderingnet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The IANA assignments/standard protocols per port are assigned in /etc/protocols - though no doubt you know that. Does changing the default assignments here help? 


​Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.​

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On March 11, 2018 1:23 PM, Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> ​​
> 
> On 11-03-18 14:16, KAction@xxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > \[2018-03-11 09:49\] Udo van den Heuvel udovdh@xxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > > On a new x86_64 firewall I notice that a freshly built obfs4proxy does
> > > 
> > > not want to bind to a port below 1024 and becomes defunct.
> > > 
> > > A port > 1024 works OK.
> > > 
> > > How do I make things work for ports below 1024?
> > 
> > Wild guess. You are aware, that port < 1024 are so-called privilleged
> > 
> > ports, and require root to open (at least with Linux), do not you?
> 
> I am aware of the difference.
> 
> Things did work on the old (firewall) box.
> 
> Things now appear different.
> 
> User root starts the thing but of course the tor user is used for normal
> 
> operation...
> 
> Udo
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> 
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk