[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tor and Stunnel?
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Tor and Stunnel?
- From: mbgsvq102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 13:03:51 +0100
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Sun, 01 May 2005 08:05:31 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20050430212127.7D10737CE9@sitemail.everyone.net>
- References: <20050430212127.7D10737CE9@sitemail.everyone.net>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
| Does anyone know of a windows socks prog (like FreeCap) that offers
| socks 4a?
Have you tried SocksCap?
http://www.socks.permeo.com/Download/SocksCapDownload/index.asp
I've used it on a number of applications that aren't SOCKS "friendly" or
only support SOCKS 5. It provides support for both SOCKS 4 and SOCKS 5
and appears more stable than FreeCap. I tried FreeCap with varying
degrees of success.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFCdMWmydQ6A0Yi1jERAu3pAJ97yRgNWegcz8xw3gYWhUujvC8QEQCgtsmw
cRsZk00iE44ma8X7rNj3P1o=
=3949
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----