[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: GPG Public Keys

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: GPG Public Keys
From: Sebastian Hahn <hahn.seb@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 01:57:41 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 21 May 2008 19:57:47 -0400
In-reply-to: <200805211826.41376.njdube@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <200805211826.41376.njdube@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


On May 22, 2008, at 1:26 AM, Nathaniel Dube wrote:

I noticed some of you have GPG keys. I tried searching key serversso I canadd your public keys to my list. It would seem either I'm notsearching theright servers or none of you have uploaded them. So I'm asking thatall of
you respond with your public keys and I'll do the same.
<0xC109AB9DD3436B3A12F148AABEC9FFB100883AA4.asc>

are you sure this is not just because subkeys.pgp.net ist notfunctional currently and it's the only keyserver you use? This hascaused some problems for some people...


I've also uploaded my key, and I was just able to download it.

Sebastian

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GPG Public Keys
  - From: Nathaniel Dube

References:
- GPG Public Keys
  - From: Nathaniel Dube

Prev by Author: Re: Tor security advisory: Debian flaw causes weak identity keys
Next by Author: Re: GPG Public Keys
Previous by thread: Re: GPG Public Keys
Next by thread: Re: GPG Public Keys
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread