[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: de-Tor-iorate Anonymity

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: de-Tor-iorate Anonymity
From: Roger Dingledine <arma@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 16:04:49 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 29 May 2008 16:04:51 -0400
In-reply-to: <4ef5fec60805291252u3cbcf874h574343f6d9594026@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4ef5fec60805291252u3cbcf874h574343f6d9594026@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:52:28PM -0700, coderman wrote:
> Is this a known or currently unknown weakness/vulnerability?
> 
> via: https://defcon.org/html/defcon-16/dc-16-speakers.html
> 
> de-Tor-iorate Anonymity
> 
> Nathan Evans
> Ph.D Student, University of Denver
> Christian Grothoff

Unknown currently. I'll mail Christian and ask him for details.

> also, there is a talk on "Generic, Decentralized, Unstoppable
> Anonymity: The Phantom Protocol" which sounds a little used car
> salesman like..
> 
> is this similar to crowds, tarzan, morphmix, or also unknown at this time?

Sounds like snake oil, doesn't it? Also unknown at this time.

--Roger

References:
- de-Tor-iorate Anonymity
  - From: coderman

Prev by Author: Re: bridge relays and bridge directories
Next by Author: Re: bridge relay: "DirPort unreachable"
Previous by thread: de-Tor-iorate Anonymity
Next by thread: Re: de-Tor-iorate Anonymity
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread