[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: perfect-privacy.com, Family specifications, etc.
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: perfect-privacy.com, Family specifications, etc.
- From: The23rd Raccoon <the.raccoon23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 07:37:17 +0000
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 20 May 2010 03:37:23 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=v4DvKIaUCxFwDb2mxNaO0/Qkv2W5gvlZ3komPqS2YPQ=; b=CJasr5NLJtBxoAwoWGHaNb/O6FLcKUV7djkzznBfBp+SUBJOgqVEvqXBgAxAeqtyT4 hkksnOA+YSRYyEhC8qIb2SrTK7Be4e+/Xy3lSMs8ifskvXkyPJfun0iOyOTEyL8cy5Nz sL5XzuuI4Py7Oc2iwCvCEwFxXwphjllwv/3K4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pi7HE4eW+XFs0txeCRyV70F6q9iAT4CWY/Ry+OVlu3AhDTiMedwExpgbZUIf1Enwxb 8h+WRrcoYs4FSzUxW9O6PWJSfLajJ0MlkoJIYwsRoK8rWfNwN/Ke3Bc05q8rVBgKkwpd 2QnZ1umVrVcjTqX1HIZdMX5B6oX4+M9Bzz6l8=
- In-reply-to: <201005200547.o4K5lG3L028053@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <201005200547.o4K5lG3L028053@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Scott Bennett <bennett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 2010 00:40:42 -0400 =?utf-8?Q?Jerzy_=C5=81ogiewa?=
> <jerzyma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>I apologize for altering the nature of this thread, but can someone =
>>please summarize what this discussion is about? Who is =
>>perfect-privacy.com and why are they of concern to Tor users? I am =
>>having a difficult time following the threads.
>>
> If you subscribed to this list after the start of the thread, just
> go to the list archives, and look for my original message. It should
> all then become clear.
This suggestion, coming from you, is especially hilarious. You haven't
yet successfully preserved a single thread you are present in. You
really need a mail client from this millennium. STFW for 'In-Reply-To
header'.
(Sorry for the noise or-talk, I was obliged to comment at that
hypocrisy. I'll go back to rummaging through the trash for delicious
snacks and discarded research papers now.)
P.S. I too had a bit of a problem following exactly why MyFamily has
to be this cumbersome. If Tor clients are already doing pair-wise
checking anyways, why can't all nodes just refer to a 'mother' node's
descriptor that lists a family key that can be used to sign a simpler
family statement. Or, just limit the number of families a node can be
a part of to just one, specified by a UUID, to limit the damage they
can do.
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/