[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Family specifications (was: Re: perfect-privacy.com, Family specifications, etc)

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 01:44:36PM -0500, bennett@xxxxxxxxxx wrote 4.7K bytes in 91 lines about:
: including some tor developers, did not bother to read the proposal by Bruce
: from perfect-privacy.com.  He did *not* propose, for example, any equivalent
: to #include statements.  He did *not* propose, for example, any method of
: allowing a node to specify other members of a Family.

You are correct.  I did not respond to Bruce's proposal.  I attempted to
explain how MyFamily works today, and some of the risks of a client
trusting the MyFamily statement from any one member of the family.  This
was suggested by others and there seems to be confusion around it.  I am
not addressing Bruce's proposal.  I leave that to Paul, Roger, and
others more qualified.

Andrew Lewman
The Tor Project
pgp 0x31B0974B

Website: https://www.torproject.org/
Blog: https://blog.torproject.org/
Identi.ca: torproject
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/